An open letter to Treasurer Josh Frydenberg

Thu, 07 Nov 2019  |  

This article was written on 8 October 2019: It was on the Yahoo Finance website at this link https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/open-letter-frydenberg-kouk-203308160.html 

-----------------------------------------------------------

An open letter to Treasurer Josh Frydenberg

Dear Josh,

On a range of policy issues, we do not see eye-to-eye.

But on the big picture view of the economy, I am sure we at one that the best thing policy can achieve for the Australian economy is sustained, strong economic growth. This means a growth rate that is sufficient to give a job to everyone who wants one, where real wages are rising and where there are improvements in the well-being of every day Australians.

As I look at the economic scorecard since you have been Treasurer, I am bitterly disappointed to see that economic growth has slumped and is no better than during

I see the unemployment not only heading higher, but the level of underemployment rising to a point where one in 12 people with a job are not working the number of hours they would like.

I look at wages growth and see stagnation, and in per capita terms, the thing that best measures true economic progress, the economy is going backwards. A per capita recession, if you like.

Then I look at what is being done about this fragile state of affairs.

To its credit, the Reserve Bank is easing monetary policy but as I am sure you are aware, the cash rate is getting close to zero which could create policy concerns for the Bank if the economy remains in the doldrums. Sure, it could implement negative interest rates or embark on a program of quantitative easing, but the impact of these policies on growth and jobs is unpredictable and may be hard to unwind, even if they work.

Which brings me to the crux of my letter to you.

You are in charge of Commonwealth government spending and taxing policies which together amount to around $1 trillion per annum. Last financial year, as you recently noted, there was an unexpected narrowing of the budget deficit from the time of the May 2018 budget.

The balanced budget you delivered occurred with the Government’s tax take for 2018-19 a remarkable $11 billion higher than forecast, while government spending was over $6 billion lower than forecast.

These differences totalled nearly $18 billion, or 0.9 per cent of GDP. That’s the difference between 2018-19 GDP growth of the actual 1.9 per cent and something closer to trend at 2.8 per cent. This money was withdrawn from the economy by your government and it is a critical reason why GDP growth has collapsed so disconcertingly.

If you are fair dinkum about being a Treasurer that wants to preside over a strong economy, where there is full employment, rising real wages and improvements in individual well-being, how about using your policy powers and prowess to get a bit of extra cash into the economy?

Don’t take my word for it.

I speak to a lot of business people around Australia and no one – yes no one - I have met in the past few months disagrees about the need for the government to do something immediate to get the economy back on track. In the mean time, their businesses are suffering and their willingness to hire and invest is severely constrained. There is unanimity from financial market economists that fiscal policy needs to be eased to get the economy back to full health. These are not the loonie left types – they are arguably some of the best practical economic types in Australia.

In simple terms, there is an urgent need for the government, your government, to pump some money into the economy via the tax system and spending if you want to not only avoid higher unemployment, but to actually get the economy back to full employment.

You are the Federal Treasurer in a Liberal Party government. The Liberal Party claims that “low taxes” are in its DNA, yet your own budget documents show you will be one of the highest taxing Treasurers in Australia’s history.

How about giving back a bit of the tax and unspent funds sitting the government’s coffers to the private sector so that they can be the driver of growth and job creation and complement the policies of the RBA in getting wages growth and inflation back to a decent level?

It is easy to do.

A few strokes of a pen and a fast track of the required legislation through the Parliament and before year-end, some extra cash can be in the hands of those who will spend, invest and employ. 

I would welcome any opportunity to meet with you to further discuss these matters and to outline some key areas where pro-active fiscal policy can help deliver growth. I cannot recall who said it, but if the government of the day gets policy and economics right, they get the politics right.

Just think, going to the election in 2022 with the economy going strongly, with the unemployment rate in the low to mid 4 per cent region and with wages growth accelerating?

You’d be Winx-like odds to win.

I look forward to hearing from you and trust you can deliver a policy framework that lifts economic growth, lowers unemployment, increases real wages and bring better times for all Australians.

Yours sincerely

Stephen Koukoulas
Managing director, Market Economics

comments powered by Disqus

THE LATEST FROM THE KOUK

The misplaced objective of the government of delivering a surplus, come hell or high water, has gone up in smoke

Tue, 07 Jan 2020

This article first appeared on the Yahoo Finance web site at this link: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/the-governments-test-in-2020-220310427.html   

---------------------------- 

The misplaced objective of the government of delivering a surplus, come hell or high water, has gone up in smoke

For many people, the cost of the fires is immeasurable. 

Or irrelevant. 

They have lost loved ones, precious possessions, businesses and dreams and for these people, what lies ahead is bleak.

Life has changed forever.

As the fires continue to ravage through huge tracts of land, destroying yet more houses, more property, incinerating livestock herds, hundreds of millions of wildlife, birds and burning millions of hectares of forests, it is important to think about the plans for what lies ahead.

The rebuilding task will be huge.

Several thousands of houses, commercial buildings and infrastructure will require billions of dollars and thousands of workers to rebuild. Then there are the furniture and fittings for these buildings – carpets, fridges, washing machines, clothes, lounges, dining tables, TVs and the like will be purchased to restock.

Then there are the thousands of cars and other machinery and equipment that will need to be replaced. 

What's ahead for the Australian economy and markets in 2020

Thu, 02 Jan 2020

What's ahead for the Australian economy and markets in 2020

Happy New Year!

2020 will be a year where Australia’s annual GDP will exceed $2 trillion, our population will get very close to 26 million people and we will clock up 29 years with no recession.

It is also a year where the economy will be a dominant issue for policy makers, will drive what happens to interest rates, will help drive investment returns and will feed into the well-being of the Australian community. 

2020 kicks off with relatively good news in terms of economic growth, even though the labour market is likely to remain weak, with wages growth struggling to lift and inflation remaining below the RBA’s 2 to 3 per cent target. The Reserve Bank may have one more interest rate cut in its kit bag, but by year end, the market is likely to price in interest rate increases, albeit modestly.

The ASX, which had a great 2019 is set to be flatten out, in part driven by the change in the interest rate outlook, but it should get a boost from better news on housing and household spending.

In terms of the specifics, I have broken down the 2020 outlook into a range of categories and given a broad explanation on the issues underpinning the themes outlined.

GDP Growth

It’s a positive outlook. A pick-up in GDP growth from the current 1.7 per cent annual rate is unfolding, with the only real issue is the extent of the acceleration.