Change of view on interest rates

Fri, 24 May 2019  |  

Having been the only economist to correctly anticipate an interest rate cut from the RBA when close to 50bps of interest rate hikes were priced in to the market last year (See Bloomberg 17 August 2018), I have agonised over the exact months the cuts would be delivered and then how many rate cuts would be needed to reflate the economy.

Recently, I was of the view that the RBA would need to cut 100bps from now, to a level of 0.5%, but I did so with relatively low confidence. This is why I recommended all clients to close their long interest rate positions on 17 April 2019 (when the implied yields were 1.10% for the mid 2020 OIS; 1.35% on 3 year yields and the Aussie dollar was just over 0.7000 at the time).

Like in most good trades that were massively in the money, I left a little money on the table while I reassessed the outlook.

Since calling for interest rate cuts from the RBA, a lot of water has passed under the bridge, especially in the last few weeks.

Events mean I am changing my view on interest rates and have been placing / will be looking to implement new trades.



Have taken account the election result of 18 May, the APRA change in lending standards and indeed, the RBA signal that it will cut rates to 1.0% in the next few months and the stunning change in market pricing, the case for the cash rate to be cut below 1.0% has faded.

In a tactical forecast, I now expect the RBA to cut the official cash rate to 1.0% in the September quarter 2019 (no point trying to get the month right when there is no money to be made from such a call), which I now see as the bottom of the interest rate cycle.

The reasons for my view change are:

The election result was important. It now likely that the RBA mandate will not materially change. There was some prospect a Labor Treasurer would elevate the importance of the 2 to 3% inflation target, which would have encouraged the RBA to cut more aggressively, but with the status quo, the RBA will cut less than if there was a change on government.

The election result also means that any downside to housing from the negative gearing and capital gains tax changes, however moderate these would have been, are gone. (I anticipated a Labor win – how bad was that!) There are also some signs that housing is about to reach a bottom which means that the RBA might tread carefully when considering a sub 1.0% cash rate.

The APRA changes to lending is also a relaxation of credit standards – a further minor boost to housing is likely as a result, which of course means less is needed from RBA rate cuts.

Banks funding costs have also fallen which has seen some retail lending rates already fall and there is a strong chance the bulk of the next 50 basis points of official interest rate cuts will be passed on, giving a reasonably big bang to the economy.

It is also clear the lower AUD, now below 0.7000, will give the already buoyant export sector a lovely boost. Commodity prices are much higher than assumed, which will be another income-positive effect on the economy if they can remain at lofty levels (even a 15% to 20% fall from today is ‘lofty’).

Another issue has been a very gentle uptick in wages in both nominal and real terms. To be sure, wages growth is weak and they are a constraint on household incomes and spending, but wages are rising 2.3% (up from a low of 1.9% in the middle of 2018) with real wages now up around 0.75% as inflation falls, and are now only a little below the long run trend.

While conditions in the global economy remain problematic, pragmatic central banks seem keen to maintain super-stimulatory monetary policy as a means to sustaining the expansion enjoyed for close to a decade. The transmission to the Australian economy from overseas should be positive.

There are a range of lower profile issues which are erring into the positive side:

The ASX is rising, giving a positive wealth effect to shareholders and superannuants – and this is a partial offset to the loss of wealth from the falls in house prices.

Consumer sentiment appears to be stabilising at OK levels. This bodes well for future spending.

Infrastructure spending appears to have a strong pipeline over the next couple of years, which will put a reasonably high floor under GDP growth.

The trade:

In simple terms, I would be looking to short the short end (mid 2020 to mid 2021 … current pricing in the OIS market is around 0.85 to 0.90%).

Of course, short the 3 year bond anything under a yield of 1.20% as the stunning rally fades after the sugar hit of easier policy from the RBA and the government is digested. I’d also look to short the 10 year around 1.60% - but with a little less conviction.

Look to get long the AUD, especially vs USD and EUR (at levels around 0.6900 and 0.6200 respectively).

This view will be further tested and built upon on coming weeks, but the interest rate cutting cycle will likely be over by the September quarter 2019 and this will have a material impact on financial markets.

Early days of course with this idea, but after a market rallies to levels no one could ever have imagined, I prefer to get out and let those who were wrong try to keep a headline by jumping on an already overpriced market.

I think there may be a turn in the interest rate cycle next year with a hike or hikes in the second half of 2020, but I will leave that for another day.

comments powered by Disqus

THE LATEST FROM THE KOUK

How Labor lost the federal election SO badly

Thu, 07 Nov 2019

This article first appeared on the Yahoo Finance website on 20 May 2019 at this link:  https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/why-labor-lost-the-election-so-badly-211049089.html 

----------------------------
How Labor lost the federal election SO badly

The Coalition did not win the election, Labor lost it.

The tally since 1993 for Labor is a devastating seven losses out of nine Federal elections. By the time of the next election in 2022, Labor will have been in Opposition for 23 of the last 29 years. Miserable.

The reasons for Labor’s 2019 election loss are much more than the common analysis that Labor’s policy agenda on tax reform was a big target that voters were not willing to embrace.

Where the Labor Party also capitulated and have for some time was in a broader discussion of the economy where it failed dismally to counter the Coalition’s claims about “a strong economy”.

In what should have been political manna from heaven for Labor, the latest economic data confirmed Australia to be in a per capita recession. This devastating economic scorecard for the Coalition government was rarely if ever mentioned by Labor leader Bill Shorten and his team during the election campaign.

This was an error.

If Labor spoke of the “per capita recession” as much as the Coalition mentioned a “strong economy”, voters would have had their economic and financial uncertainties and concerns confirmed by an elevated debate on the economy based on facts.

This parlous economic position could have been cited by Labor for its reform agenda.

Why animals are a crucial part of the Australian economy

Thu, 07 Nov 2019

This article was written on 31 October 2019: It was on the Yahoo Finance website at this link: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/animals-crucial-australian-economy-192927904.html 

------------------------------------------------------

Why animals are a crucial part of the Australian economy

Animals are a critical part of the Australian economy, either for food, companionship or entertainment.

But every month, millions of sheep, cattle, pigs, chickens, fish and other animals are bred and then killed. Most of them are killed in what we define as ‘humane’, but no doubt tens of thousands are horribly mistreated, as are a proportion of the animals we keep as pets.

Animals are slaughtered to provide food for human food consumption, to feed other animals (your cats and dogs are carnivorous) and for fertiliser.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics collects a range of data on animal slaughterings and the most recent release of the Livestock and Meat data release included the following facts.