First home owner grants and the people's bank plan push house prices higher

Wed, 11 Apr 2018  |  

This article first appeared on The Guardian website at this link: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/11/first-home-owner-grants-and-the-peoples-bank-plan-push-house-prices-higher?CMP=soc_3156 

 ----------------------------------------------------------------

First home owner grants and the people's bank plan push house prices higher

The Reserve Bank of Australia must be dismayed at the policies from several state governments that have increased cash payments to first home buyers and propose a people’s bank that, among other things, will make it easier for potential owner-occupiers to access credit and bid for a house.

The last thing potential property buyers need is easier access to credit and cash handouts to boost demand. Indeed, the RBA and other regulators are still working the other way, keeping policy tight so that credit growth continues to slow and with that, there will be some rebalancing of household balance sheets away from ever increasing debt.

The first home owners grant increases in NSW and Victoria have underpinned prices, with the number of first home buyers rising around 35% over the past year. In addition to adding to demand for housing, these policies have also been costly to the state budget position.

Without this surge in first home buyer activity, house prices would have no doubt been weaker still and that may have allowed the RBA to be more proactive in setting monetary policy with an eye to boosting demand and lowering unemployment which would impact positively on wages growth and in time see inflation return to the target.

One of the important economic issues that will likely have a significant impact on the economy and policy, is the fall in house prices that is steadily unfolding.

Outside Darwin and Perth, where prices have slumped by over 20% and 10% respectively from their peaks, the falls are not yet substantial, but they could be signalling the early stages of a fall in household wealth which, if sustained, would have consequences for the economy.

In the two mega-cities, Sydney and Melbourne, prices are down 4% and 1%, respectively, from the late 2017 peaks and according to the Corelogic price data, there is no evidence that the falls in prices are abating.

A cooling housing market where prices stabilise or even fall a little, was a key aspect of the RBA decision to leave interest rates relatively high since about 2013 when the rest of the industrialised world was implementing near zero interest rates.

Along with enhancing financial stability, a weakening in house price growth was an unspoken but obvious consequence from the regulators as they imposed a range of rules to scale back bank lending, especially to investors and more risky borrowers.

The cost to the rest of the economy of deflating the house price boom has been sub-trend economic growth, little or no progress in reducing unemployment, ongoing weakness in wages and depressed levels of business investment.

The RBA had made it abundantly clear that it is happy to see the economy pay this price for the sake of a weaker house prices and a marked slowing in credit growth.

Yet some policy advocates are looking at ways to rekindle demand for housing which would completely undermine the years of RBA policy. This is where the boost to first home owners grant and the proposed people’s banks are unhelpful.

As the RBA and other housing analysts have often noted, the best long run way to further improve housing affordability is to increase the supply of dwellings relative to changes in demand.
Translated, this means building more dwellings in areas that are well services by public transport, school, shops, employment opportunities and other basic amenities.

This means either increasing the population density in the big cities, which is reasonably easy to plan for, or undertaking a significant spend on infrastructure so that living away from the centre of the major cities is more desirable. If the government also wants to see an improvement in housing affordability, it could trim the immigration inflow which would work from scaling back underlying demand. It is easy to do – the stroke of a pen could see immigration levels lowered.

Many issues in economics and economic policy can be analysed and the problems addressed with relatively straightforward policy prescriptions.

For housing, it is adding to supply relative to a given level of demand.

Well intentioned policies, such as the first home owners grant and the home buyer friendly people’s bank, work the other way and make housing even more unaffordable. They also suffer from the economists nightmare of complexity and productivity destroying red tape, and even a cursory look at the economic effects make them counterproductive.

They push prices higher as would-be buyers go to housing auctions with access to more money either with the grant or extra credit.

While these misguided policies are in place or threatened to be imposed, it will be harder for housing prices to adjust so that affordability is further improved, especially for would be first home buyers.

comments powered by Disqus

THE LATEST FROM THE KOUK

How Labor lost the federal election SO badly

Thu, 07 Nov 2019

This article first appeared on the Yahoo Finance website on 20 May 2019 at this link:  https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/why-labor-lost-the-election-so-badly-211049089.html 

----------------------------
How Labor lost the federal election SO badly

The Coalition did not win the election, Labor lost it.

The tally since 1993 for Labor is a devastating seven losses out of nine Federal elections. By the time of the next election in 2022, Labor will have been in Opposition for 23 of the last 29 years. Miserable.

The reasons for Labor’s 2019 election loss are much more than the common analysis that Labor’s policy agenda on tax reform was a big target that voters were not willing to embrace.

Where the Labor Party also capitulated and have for some time was in a broader discussion of the economy where it failed dismally to counter the Coalition’s claims about “a strong economy”.

In what should have been political manna from heaven for Labor, the latest economic data confirmed Australia to be in a per capita recession. This devastating economic scorecard for the Coalition government was rarely if ever mentioned by Labor leader Bill Shorten and his team during the election campaign.

This was an error.

If Labor spoke of the “per capita recession” as much as the Coalition mentioned a “strong economy”, voters would have had their economic and financial uncertainties and concerns confirmed by an elevated debate on the economy based on facts.

This parlous economic position could have been cited by Labor for its reform agenda.

Why animals are a crucial part of the Australian economy

Thu, 07 Nov 2019

This article was written on 31 October 2019: It was on the Yahoo Finance website at this link: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/animals-crucial-australian-economy-192927904.html 

------------------------------------------------------

Why animals are a crucial part of the Australian economy

Animals are a critical part of the Australian economy, either for food, companionship or entertainment.

But every month, millions of sheep, cattle, pigs, chickens, fish and other animals are bred and then killed. Most of them are killed in what we define as ‘humane’, but no doubt tens of thousands are horribly mistreated, as are a proportion of the animals we keep as pets.

Animals are slaughtered to provide food for human food consumption, to feed other animals (your cats and dogs are carnivorous) and for fertiliser.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics collects a range of data on animal slaughterings and the most recent release of the Livestock and Meat data release included the following facts.