How should fact checkers check facts?

Fri, 14 Mar 2014  |  

Here's a simple question.

The Treasurer Mr Hockey makes a claim that "Of the 17 top surveyed IMF countries, Labor left us with the fastest growth in spending of anyone in the world... and they left us with the third highest growth in debt of anyone in the top 17".

You are asked to check this for its factual basis, not an easy job, but it is important to see whether the Treasurer is telling porkies or if he is correct.

A fair enough strating point is to go to the Treasurer's office and ask, what is the source of this claim?

When the source is provided, any reasonable fact checker should query the veracity of the information in that document to see whether the Treasurer is right or not or whether he is being a little bit cheeky and used a flawed report for his claims.

It would be wrong to blindly take the source as given, without question or consideration. To take that as the correct source might be making in error in the same way it would be wrong to use The Australian as a source for any impartial facts on Australia's industrial relations system.

A fact checker should, of course, also be a little more forensic and judge whether the information in the source document fits with the claim being made.

In the case of the ABC fact check on Mr Hockey's claim on debt and deficit, the ABC FCU took the Treasurer's Office reference to the IMF document as the definitive source of the claim that Labor left the Coalition with the fastest growth in spending and third highest growth in government debt among the countries compared. The ABC FCU said Mr Hockey's claim was "correct'.

What they didn't do was make a judgment call on the IMF document.

Importantly, the claim from Mr Hockey which the ABC FCU said was "correct" was based on a start date of 2012. The starting point ignores the fact that Labor delivered a Federal Budget and countless other policy changes between 1 January 2013 and when the writs were issued for the election in August 2013.

Even the drover's dog would see the starting point is wrong when judging what Labor left the Coalition.

There are no doubt similar concerns for the other 16 countries in the comparison – in the US for example, the fiscal cliff, debt ceiling debates and even Fed policy actions from 1 January 2013 would have impacted on the scenario for fiscal policy in what should have been the base year 2013. What was its growth in spending and debt from 2013 to 2018?

As I also pointed out, , the comparison that the ABC FCU and the IMF based its data on was the MYEFO document which included a fiscally explosive cocktail of policy decisions taken by the Abbott government in its first three months and parameter changes from Treasury – hardly the stuff anyone reasonable could serious sheet home to Labor.

I don't know whether Mr Hockey's claims are true or not and neither does the ABC FCU, at least based on their work on this issue.

Some smart person with a lot of time and a robust data base could no doubt work it out, but to say Mr Hockey is correct based on a document he gave the ABC FCU, it is a bit too cheap and easy.

comments powered by Disqus



Wed, 29 Jul 2020



Covid19 has opened a door for Australians to positively accept significant changes that will lead to a shared good. This rare opportunity enables us to achieve sustainable economic and social goals that create a new ‘normal’ as our way of life.

These Ten Steps are presented as non-partisan recommendations to the Australian Parliament in the firm belief that, if they embrace them, the Australian economy and society will be greatly enhanced after the Covid19 pandemic has passed.

*A job for you if you want one.
A significant increase in part time and casual employment can be created that will enable you to enjoy a more creative and peaceful lifestyle and to live longer and better. The traditional age at which you would have been expected to retire will become obsolete as a result. An access age for pension and superannuation will become your choice. This will enable you to remain in paid work for as long as you want to, on a basis that you choose, while boosting the productivity and growth of Australia.

*You will get wage increases that will be greater than your cost of living.
A demand for enhanced innovative skills at all levels of employment will be created as the economy grows in strength, thereby enhancing your stature in the workforce and enabling executive salaries and bonuses to drop to levels that are accepted as justifiable by employees, shareholders and customers.

The misplaced objective of the government of delivering a surplus, come hell or high water, has gone up in smoke

Tue, 07 Jan 2020

This article first appeared on the Yahoo Finance web site at this link:   


The misplaced objective of the government of delivering a surplus, come hell or high water, has gone up in smoke

For many people, the cost of the fires is immeasurable. 

Or irrelevant. 

They have lost loved ones, precious possessions, businesses and dreams and for these people, what lies ahead is bleak.

Life has changed forever.

As the fires continue to ravage through huge tracts of land, destroying yet more houses, more property, incinerating livestock herds, hundreds of millions of wildlife, birds and burning millions of hectares of forests, it is important to think about the plans for what lies ahead.

The rebuilding task will be huge.

Several thousands of houses, commercial buildings and infrastructure will require billions of dollars and thousands of workers to rebuild. Then there are the furniture and fittings for these buildings – carpets, fridges, washing machines, clothes, lounges, dining tables, TVs and the like will be purchased to restock.

Then there are the thousands of cars and other machinery and equipment that will need to be replaced.