Sell everything! My challenge to Andrew Roberts of RBS

Wed, 13 Jan 2016  |  

Andrew Roberts, the “sell everything” analyst at RBS, has certainly gained a lot of coverage for himself and his business. If that was the aim, it was a great success to write such headline grabbing 'research' on the hope the media would run with it.

So ten out of ten for Andrew.

But the work prompted me to think about what Andrew was actually saying and I am wondering whether he is will to put his money where his mouth is. To that end, I sent his the following email.

Dear Andrew

I note with interest your “sell mostly everything” note from earlier this week. I think you will be wrong and in the spirit of the market and healthy competition would like to offer you a chance to personally benefit from your forecast.

How about a bet of, say, A$10,000, that more than half of the items in list below will be stronger on 31 December 2016 than they have been in recent days? I am open to a different amount to wager, just let me know what you are comfortable with.

I note with each the recent level or market price and if it is higher on 31 December, chalk that one to me, if it is lower, that is for you. I have 11 variables that you imply are a “sell” – they cover a range of asset classes and locations and if you are correct with your forecast, most will be lower than today. SO the winner will have six or more go in their favour.

US stocks (S&P 500) 1925.0 points

Brazil stocks (Ibovespa) 39,500 points

China stocks (Shenzhen) 1,850.0 points

Japan stocks (Nikkei) 17,200.0

US house prices (Case-Shiller 20 city) 182.83 points

UK 20 city house prices (Hometrack measure) GBP228,800

Sydney House prices (Corelogic index) 915.00

Iron Ore US$40.50 a tonne

Oil WTI $US31.50 a barrel

Copper US$4,325 a tonne

AUD/USD 0.7000

Please let me know if you are happy to take up the offer. I am will to put my hard earned money where my mouth is – I hope you are too.

All the best

Stephen

 

Andrew has yet to respond to my very generous offer. After all, he only has to get six out of 11 to win – not “everything”. I will confirm whether or not Andrew is up for the challenge.

Either way, I will track this post from time to time.

comments powered by Disqus

THE LATEST FROM THE KOUK

'Jobs and growth'? Both are stalling actually

Tue, 24 May 2016

This article first appeared on the Yahoo7 site at this address: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/-job-and-growth---both-are-stalling-actually-223940793.html 

---------------------------------------

'Jobs and growth'? Both are stalling actually

Record low wages growth and job creation has stalled.

These are the facts on the labour market revealed this week as the election campaign rolls along and economic policy underpins the campaigns of the major parties. For the Coalition, the campaign slogan ‘jobs and growth’ is running a bit thin with this news.

The rate of employment growth has stalled with only 27,500 additional jobs over the last five months.

Over this time, the working age population has increased by 136,800 meaning that 80 per cent of new entrants to the labour market have not found work. In a strong labour market, the take up of new entrants to the labour market is usually 65 to 70 per cent.

Making the news even more problematic is the decline in full-time employment, which has dropped 31,600 in the last five months. This means that the number of hours worked within the labour market is falling, suggesting a softer tone to the rate of economic growth and another constraint on consumer spending as part-time workers take home less pay than full-time workers.

Better schools will benefit the whole economy. Why can't the Coalition see that?

Mon, 23 May 2016

Thjis article first appeared on The Guardian website at this link: http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/commentisfree/2016/may/20/better-schools-will-benefit-the-whole-economy-why-cant-the-coalition-see-that 

-------------------------------------------------

Better schools will benefit the whole economy. Why can't the Coalition see that?

Education policy is a hot button issue in the election campaign with the Coalition paring back funding for schools, universities and trades while Labor is advocating a multi-billion dollar boost for education across all segments to promote equality, raise productivity and grow the economy.

The Coalition’s lack of commitment to education is shown by its policy to give just $1.2bn to needs-based school funding, well short of the $4.5bn commitment from Labor under the Gonski reforms to lift education standards. It is a similar issue with the Coalition’s approach to university funding where higher fees will discourage students from gaining a higher education.

It is an odd debate given that the relationship between educational attainment and growth and income is a given. The more skilled and educated a workforce, the better off is the economy and the population.