It's now $61.15 billion of gross borrowing by the Abbott government

Fri, 21 Mar 2014  |  

The week ends with the Abbott government borrowing a further $700 million today, which brings the total of gross borrowing since 9 September 2013 to $61.15 billion.

$61.15 billion of bond and T-Notes that have been issued in just over six months as the government funds the budget deficit, covers maturing bonds and T-Notes and prepares to fund a range of its policy expenditure items.

As I have noted at nausium on the issue of government debt over recent years, the Australian government's debt level remains trivial, chicken feed, small beer and the campaign of the Coalition Parties to suggest otherwise was factually flawed and it still is.

Even in government, the Coalition bemoan the level of debt and pretend it is a major factor threatening to undermine Australian sovereign risk or some similar nonsense.

The credit ratings agencies, all which rank Australia triple-A with a stable outlook and have since 2011, suggest the level of government is low. So do foreign investors who own close to three-quarters of the government bond market and a huge proportion of the stocks listed on the ASX as well as an increasingly large holding of property. They do so comfortable in the knowledge that a government debt problem that would hurt the Australian dollar or bond yields is very unlikely.

The cumulative effect of the new borrowing means that gross government debt now stands at $310.1 billion, some $36 billion higher than when Mr Abbott convincingly won the 2013 election.

It was always obvious the promise to stop the borrowing and repay Labor's debt were false. The facts confirm this.

comments powered by Disqus


Is the interest rate cutting cycle over?

Fri, 17 Apr 2015

Relative to market pricing, the economy is starting looking a little better than it was a few months ago, a time when I changed my view on the Australian dollar and interest rates Early days, but so far so good on this call.

Yesterday’s labour force data matched the recent solid rise in retail spending and the spectacular boom in housing construction evident over the last year. The domestic economy is, maybe, on a path to stronger growth with the sources of strength happening to be in labour intensive sectors while the weakness in is areas that does not employment a lot of people. By that I mean the number of workers needed to make an extra $1 million worth of café lattes is considerably more than the number needed to dig out an extra $1 million worth of iron ore.

The unhealthy obsession with the drop in iron ore prices has blind-sided many to the other 90 to 95 per cent of the economy. The trick in economic forecasting and market strategy is, it should be obvious, to look at all aspects of activity all of the time, even if there are outsized moves in some sectors.

Should the anti-vaccination crowd be paid to immunise their children?

Mon, 13 Apr 2015

If the Coalition government applied the same criteria used for its Direct Action on climate change to the problem of people not immunisating their children, it would pay the anti-vaccination crowd to have their children jabbed and not act to make their financial position worse off.

Indeed, the Coalition reckons that if they cut family payments and childcare rebates to parents who don’t vaccinate their children, immunisation rates will rise.

Maybe they will. Maybe they wont. I certainly don’t know enough about the reasons why some parents don’t vaccinate their children to know whether that financial incentive will work. After all, the anti-vaccination people seem adamant that they want to have their children exposed to illnesses that might kill them, with financial incentives seemingly not an issue. I suppose there are many different sorts of child neglect.