It's now $61.15 billion of gross borrowing by the Abbott government

Fri, 21 Mar 2014  |  

The week ends with the Abbott government borrowing a further $700 million today, which brings the total of gross borrowing since 9 September 2013 to $61.15 billion.

$61.15 billion of bond and T-Notes that have been issued in just over six months as the government funds the budget deficit, covers maturing bonds and T-Notes and prepares to fund a range of its policy expenditure items.

As I have noted at nausium on the issue of government debt over recent years, the Australian government's debt level remains trivial, chicken feed, small beer and the campaign of the Coalition Parties to suggest otherwise was factually flawed and it still is.

Even in government, the Coalition bemoan the level of debt and pretend it is a major factor threatening to undermine Australian sovereign risk or some similar nonsense.

The credit ratings agencies, all which rank Australia triple-A with a stable outlook and have since 2011, suggest the level of government is low. So do foreign investors who own close to three-quarters of the government bond market and a huge proportion of the stocks listed on the ASX as well as an increasingly large holding of property. They do so comfortable in the knowledge that a government debt problem that would hurt the Australian dollar or bond yields is very unlikely.

The cumulative effect of the new borrowing means that gross government debt now stands at $310.1 billion, some $36 billion higher than when Mr Abbott convincingly won the 2013 election.

It was always obvious the promise to stop the borrowing and repay Labor's debt were false. The facts confirm this.

comments powered by Disqus

THE LATEST FROM THE KOUK

9 questions for Mr Turnbull who's on Q&A tonight

Mon, 20 Jun 2016

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull will be on Q&A tonight and let’s hope that at least a few of the questions cut to the key points of economic management. With the economy confronting a range of economic challenges, here are nine questions that Mr Turnbull should be asked.

Why negative gearing makes little difference to house prices

Tue, 14 Jun 2016

This article first appeared on the Yahoo7 Finance website at this link: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/why-negative-gearing-makes-little-difference-to-house-prices-220614834.html 

-------------------------------------------------------

Why negative gearing makes little difference to house prices

Negative gearing makes little difference to house prices.

Other factors such as new construction, demand from population growth, the unemployment rate and the overall business cycle are far more important determinants of house price changes than tax rules. One only has to look at the recent capital house price trends for unambiguous proof.

Since January 2015, Sydney house prices have risen by around 20 per cent. Over the same timeframe, Perth house prices have fallen by around 9 per cent.

This massive 30 per cent differential between Sydney and Perth house prices in just 18 months, has occurred with the existing negative gearing and capital gains tax laws in place. Nothing has changed in tax policy over that time. Quite plainly, something other than negative gearing rules are impacting on house prices.